由於前兩個評論我已經刪除了所有我自己的代碼,並直接從4個人放在這裏的例子。高效的sql服務器分頁
我對'select @first_id'應該如何編碼感興趣。這個例子顯示了使用連接拉動的行,我期望first_id不是一個有效的開始位置,因爲它不使用相同的連接語法。
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_PageResults_NAI]
(
@startRowIndex int,
@maximumRows int
)
AS
DECLARE @first_id int, @startRow int
-- A check can be added to make sure @startRowIndex isn't > count(1)
-- from employees before doing any actual work unless it is guaranteed
-- the caller won't do that
-- Get the first employeeID for our page of records
SET ROWCOUNT @startRowIndex
SELECT @first_id = employeeID FROM employees ORDER BY employeeid
-- Now, set the row count to MaximumRows and get
-- all records >= @first_id
SET ROWCOUNT @maximumRows
SELECT e.*, d.name as DepartmentName
FROM employees e
INNER JOIN Departments D ON
e.DepartmentID = d.DepartmentID
WHERE employeeid >= @first_id
ORDER BY e.EmployeeID
SET ROWCOUNT 0
GO
高效分頁縱觀複雜我。 –
'請在沒有上下文的情況下調試我的代碼' - 不用了,謝謝。 – JNK
這個例子看起來不錯,因爲一個Employee只在一個部門中,所以連接不會改變行數。儘管如此,這是一種SQL Server 2000方法。 'row_number'在2005+更容易 –