0
我有一個VPS，我們在其中託管了多個域。我們的電子郵件存在問題，因爲我們很少的域名的電子郵件始終在Gmail中發送垃圾郵件。我們爲所有域添加了DKIM和SPF。在我未能解決問題後，我也嘗試與我的託管服務提供商聯繫（Host IT Smart）。他們也無法找到任何解決方案。你能建議我解決這個問題嗎？以下是verifier.port25.com即使在添加DKIM和SFP記錄後，電子郵件也會從我的vps發送到Gmail垃圾郵件文件夾中
This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
service at verifier.port25.com. The service allows email senders to perform
a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided
free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While
it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
<[email protected]>.
Thank you for using the verifier,
The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team
==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check: pass
DomainKeys check: neutral
DKIM check: pass
Sender-ID check: pass
SpamAssassin check: ham
==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================
HELO hostname: vps.technowebs.in
Source IP: 23.236.190.220
mail-from: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: [email protected]
DNS record(s):
easyretail.in. SPF (no records)
easyretail.in. 11089 IN TXT "v=spf1 +a +mx +23.236.190.220 ~all"
easyretail.in. 0 IN A 23.236.190.220
----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: [email protected]
DNS record(s):
----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass (matches From: [email protected])
ID(s) verified: header.d=easyretail.in
Canonicalized Headers:
date:Fri,'20'26'20'Feb'20'2016'20'20:12:29'20'+0530'0D''0A'
from:[email protected]'0D''0A'
to:<[email protected]>'0D''0A'
subject:t'0D''0A'
dkim-signature:v=1;'20'a=rsa-sha256;'20'c=relaxed/simple;'20'd=easyretail.in;'20's=default;'20't=1456497749;'20'bh=nosD6jtIMS+OOhW+x6qFyWo2Lid2rGvD39dKQAIrzIo=;'20'h=Date:From:To:Subject;'20'b=
Canonicalized Body:
t'0D''0A'
DNS record(s):
default._domainkey.easyretail.in. 14400 IN TXT "v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCsF6ZDVntzQYgh7niTVm4zEGxx3tpKuRDEtjj2lCNSGotO409tcZNAf2TZwsXCMRqOFmlgcRbbvGCI3Ze1l4EiW/msO2/KpFnf0mJ0iDQ4GH7zj7WBIql+yoZAaoYmyYsX7RWeVn9J+yYQcjSYL8/znm1nVZVwi8LLGRyB8+O4ZQIDAQAB"
Public key used for verification: default._domainkey.easyretail.in (1024 bits)
NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.
----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: [email protected]
DNS record(s):
easyretail.in. SPF (no records)
easyretail.in. 11089 IN TXT "v=spf1 +a +mx +23.236.190.220 ~all"
easyretail.in. 0 IN A 23.236.190.220
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.4.0 (2014-02-07)
Result: ham (-2.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 BODY_SINGLE_WORD Message body is only one word (no spaces)
==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451)
==========================================================
SPF and Sender-ID Results
=========================
"none"
No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain.
"neutral"
The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not
want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized
to send mail using the sender's DNS domain.
"pass"
The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or
relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain.
"policy"
The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf
of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication
method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is
unacceptable.
"fail"
This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or
relay mail using the sender's DNS domain.
"softfail"
The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized
to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is
unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect.
"temperror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
retrieve a policy record from DNS. A later attempt may produce a
final result.
"permerror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or
a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record. A later attempt is
unlikely to produce a final result.
DKIM and DomainKeys Results
===========================
"none"
The message was not signed.
"pass"
The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed
verification tests.
"fail"
The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification
test(s).
"policy"
The message was signed but the signature or signatures were
not acceptable to the verifier.
"neutral"
The message was signed but the signature or signatures
contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
processed. This result SHOULD also be used for other
failures not covered elsewhere in this list.
"temperror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability
to retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a
final result.
"permerror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being
absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.
==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from vps.technowebs.in (23.236.190.220) by verifier.port25.com id hq1i5c20i3gi for <[email protected]>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:42:30 -0500 (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=pass [email protected]
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; domainkeys=neutral (message not signed) [email protected]
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; dkim=pass (matches From: [email protected]) header.d=easyretail.in
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; sender-id=pass [email protected]
Received: from www.easyretail.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by vps.technowebs.in (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8C6093C2593
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:12:29 +0530 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=easyretail.in;
s=default; t=1456497749;
bh=nosD6jtIMS+OOhW+x6qFyWo2Lid2rGvD39dKQAIrzIo=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject;
b=L/XoimrjmAdUbjHxyfObm/LTNlJ25vRQCV91JBE+lv82/WLMCOGSLP56LULw1DvWC
aDM9rpn3oIaS6Pw+Iqo120fFjvbhH1WotrmoknGEVDsqBPh1V0UYFoA7hVkLeUcoIi
y0ZVzMDvcDIjQxN0v+vcqdJ5K10WYUJ7uCOqZHO8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:12:29 +0530
From: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: t
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.5
提前感謝響應您的幫助。
最好的問候， Rajib德布
感謝您的建議，讓我們看看接下來會發生什麼。 –