2016-07-19 109 views
0

我在問你的幫助。我正在努力處理R存儲和處理數據價值的方式。這裏是我的例子:R返回奇怪的順序排列

我有一個矩陣4x3。在每一行上,我計算每對(步驟2在我的代碼)之間的絕對不同:

xi_xj[i,1] = abs(x[i, 1]-x[i, 2]) # the different btw the 1st and 2nd elements 

xi_xj[i,2] = abs(x[i, 1]-x[i, 3]) # the different btw the 1st and 3rd elements 

xi_xj[i,3] = abs(x[i, 2]-x[i, 3]) # the different btw the 2nd and 3rd elements 

一旦xi_xj被計算,我會爲了在每行3個元素以遞增順序並返回索引或排列(我的代碼中的第3步)。我使用功能order()來執行此操作。但是,我對xi_xj的第4行有奇怪的返回排列,其中包含(0.3, 0.6,0.3)。我預計返回排列應該是{1, 3, 2}這意味着「第一個元素(0.3)第一個,第三個元素(0.3),第二個最後(0.6)」。當代碼運行時,它會返回奇怪的順序{3,1,2}。我在這裏很困惑。我在我的代碼中添加了#test1#test 2,我清楚地看到xi_xj[4,1]xi_xj[4,3]「略有不同」,數量爲1.110223e-16,這很奇怪。我懷疑這是由於R auto用來處理我的數據的數據類型,在這種情況下它是「雙倍」的。我不知道如何解決這個問題。

這裏是我的代碼:

rm(list=ls()) 
cat("\014") 
N=4 
M = 3 

#1. given X matrix N rows and M cols 
(x=matrix(c(0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.1,0.2,0.7, 0.1, 0.4, 0.7, 0.2, 0.4, 0.7), nrow=N, ncol=M)) 


#2. calculate the pairwise distance of each pairs abs(x[k,i]-x[k,j]) in each row kth 
(xi_xj <- matrix(0, nrow =N, ncol = M, byrow = TRUE)) 
for (i in 1: N){ 
    xi_xj[i,1] = abs(x[i, 1]-x[i, 2]) 
    xi_xj[i,2] = abs(x[i, 1]-x[i, 3]) 
    xi_xj[i,3] = abs(x[i, 2]-x[i, 3]) 
} 

xi_xj 

# 3. In each row, we will need to return the permutation which their value are ordered increasingly. 
#create a matrix to store the permutaion or indexing of the increasing order 
index_xi_xj = matrix(0, nrow=N, ncol=M) 
for (i in 1: N){ 
    #process on each row 
    (temp <- xi_xj[i,]) 

    #get the index of rearangment in increasing order 
    index_xi_xj[i,]<- order(temp, decreasing= FALSE) 
} 
index_xi_xj[4,] 
# COMMENT ON THE RESULT: 
# PROBLEM comes from the 4th row of the xi_xj[4, ] containing value {0.3, 0.6, 0.3}. 
# Once R order them in increasing order, we should have CORRECT permutation {1,3,2} 
# of their ordering instead of {3,1,2} as index_xi_xj[4,] 


#------------------------------------------- 
# 4. test 1: check whether the data in xi_xj[4,1] == xi_xj[4,1] as we see on the console? 
xi_xj 
if(xi_xj[4,1]==xi_xj[4,3]){ 
    cat("equal") 
}else {print ("different") 
     cat("error = ", xi_xj[4,1]-xi_xj[4,3]) 
} 

# 5. test 2: however, if we order the list of c(0.3, 0.6, 0.3), the function "order()" returns correct permutation {1, 3, 2} 
(order(c(0.3, 0.6, 0.3), decreasing=FALSE)) 

回答