0
我試圖回填我對C內存管理的知識。我主要來自腳本和託管背景,我想了解更多關於C和C++的知識。爲此我一直在讀了幾本書,其中包括其中包括使用realloc
修剪空格的字符串的這個例子:Valgrind報告無效Realloc
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
char* trim(char* phrase)
{
char* old = phrase;
char* new = phrase;
while(*old == ' ') {
old++;
}
while(*old) {
*(new++) = *(old++);
}
*new = 0;
return (char*)realloc(phrase, strlen(phrase)+1);
}
int main()
{
char* buffer = (char*)malloc(strlen(" cat")+1);
strcpy(buffer, " cat");
printf("%s\n", trim(buffer));
free(buffer);
buffer=NULL;
return 0;
}
我忠實地複製的例子,並與c99 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -O3 -pedantic -march=native
編譯。我沒有收到任何編譯錯誤,並且該應用程序運行並遵循本書所承諾的內容,但是當我針對valgrind運行它時,出現無效的錯誤realloc
。
==21601== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==21601== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==21601== Using Valgrind-3.10.0.SVN and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==21601== Command: ./trim
==21601==
==21601== Invalid free()/delete/delete[]/realloc()
==21601== at 0x402B3D8: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==21601== by 0x804844E: main (in /home/mo/programming/learning_pointers/trim)
==21601== Address 0x4202028 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 6 free'd
==21601== at 0x402C324: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==21601== by 0x80485A9: trim (in /home/mo/programming/learning_pointers/trim)
==21601== by 0x804842E: main (in /home/mo/programming/learning_pointers/trim)
==21601==
==21601==
==21601== HEAP SUMMARY:
==21601== in use at exit: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
==21601== total heap usage: 2 allocs, 2 frees, 10 bytes allocated
==21601==
==21601== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1
==21601== at 0x402C324: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==21601== by 0x80485A9: trim (in /home/mo/programming/learning_pointers/trim)
==21601== by 0x804842E: main (in /home/mo/programming/learning_pointers/trim)
==21601==
==21601== LEAK SUMMARY:
==21601== definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
==21601== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==21601== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==21601== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==21601== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==21601==
==21601== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==21601== ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
所以請幫助我理解爲什麼它認爲無效的realloc。是垃圾的例子嗎?有什麼我失蹤?我知道根據規範,realloc期望指針已經由malloc創建,那麼是因爲realloc在另一個函數中?還是valgrind困惑,因爲他們在不同的功能?我不是一個完全白癡(大多數日子),但現在我有點覺得沒有看到這個問題。
在此先感謝!
它就在那裏。看,一時失明。我認爲它必須是我正在做的事情,但我只是沒有看到它。真棒。非常感謝! –