我寫文件a)項規定的方法來使用的fcntl方便地鎖定它(的子類,所以只支持Unix,然而這是OK,我ATM)和b )當讀或寫斷言該文件被適當地鎖定時。工具,可以幫助在文件鎖定 - 專家提示想
現在我不是這方面的專家(我剛剛讀了one paper [de]瞭解它),並希望得到一些反饋:它是否安全,是否存在競爭條件,是否有其他方面可以做得更好......在這裏是代碼:
from fcntl import flock, LOCK_EX, LOCK_SH, LOCK_UN, LOCK_NB
class LockedFile(file):
"""
A wrapper around `file` providing locking. Requires a shared lock to read
and a exclusive lock to write.
Main differences:
* Additional methods: lock_ex, lock_sh, unlock
* Refuse to read when not locked, refuse to write when not locked
exclusivly.
* mode cannot be `w` since then the file would be truncated before
it could be locked.
You have to lock the file yourself, it won't be done for you implicitly.
Only you know what lock you need.
Example usage::
def get_config():
f = LockedFile(CONFIG_FILENAME, 'r')
f.lock_sh()
config = parse_ini(f.read())
f.close()
def set_config(key, value):
f = LockedFile(CONFIG_FILENAME, 'r+')
f.lock_ex()
config = parse_ini(f.read())
config[key] = value
f.truncate()
f.write(make_ini(config))
f.close()
"""
def __init__(self, name, mode='r', *args, **kwargs):
if 'w' in mode:
raise ValueError('Cannot open file in `w` mode')
super(LockedFile, self).__init__(name, mode, *args, **kwargs)
self.locked = None
def lock_sh(self, **kwargs):
"""
Acquire a shared lock on the file. If the file is already locked
exclusively, do nothing.
:returns: Lock status from before the call (one of 'sh', 'ex', None).
:param nonblocking: Don't wait for the lock to be available.
"""
if self.locked == 'ex':
return # would implicitly remove the exclusive lock
return self._lock(LOCK_SH, **kwargs)
def lock_ex(self, **kwargs):
"""
Acquire an exclusive lock on the file.
:returns: Lock status from before the call (one of 'sh', 'ex', None).
:param nonblocking: Don't wait for the lock to be available.
"""
return self._lock(LOCK_EX, **kwargs)
def unlock(self):
"""
Release all locks on the file.
Flushes if there was an exclusive lock.
:returns: Lock status from before the call (one of 'sh', 'ex', None).
"""
if self.locked == 'ex':
self.flush()
return self._lock(LOCK_UN)
def _lock(self, mode, nonblocking=False):
flock(self, mode | bool(nonblocking) * LOCK_NB)
before = self.locked
self.locked = {LOCK_SH: 'sh', LOCK_EX: 'ex', LOCK_UN: None}[mode]
return before
def _assert_read_lock(self):
assert self.locked, "File is not locked"
def _assert_write_lock(self):
assert self.locked == 'ex', "File is not locked exclusively"
def read(self, *args):
self._assert_read_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).read(*args)
def readline(self, *args):
self._assert_read_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).readline(*args)
def readlines(self, *args):
self._assert_read_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).readlines(*args)
def xreadlines(self, *args):
self._assert_read_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).xreadlines(*args)
def __iter__(self):
self._assert_read_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).__iter__()
def next(self):
self._assert_read_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).next()
def write(self, *args):
self._assert_write_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).write(*args)
def writelines(self, *args):
self._assert_write_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).writelines(*args)
def flush(self):
self._assert_write_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).flush()
def truncate(self, *args):
self._assert_write_lock()
return super(LockedFile, self).truncate(*args)
def close(self):
self.unlock()
return super(LockedFile, self).close()
(在文檔字符串的例子,也是我目前使用的情況下,此)爲已經閱讀直到到這裏
感謝,甚至可能回答:)
我不認爲除了應OSError'的'後裔(因爲它不是由無效,OS具體用法引起),也不是'IOError'(因爲有沒有與IO有問題)。這是最相似的'EOFError'(一切都很好,但你不能做到這一點與本文件),雖然一個EOF條件不是一個子集;所以它應該很可能只是從'Exception'下降,因爲沒有別的選擇。 – SingleNegationElimination 2011-08-02 18:03:58
反正,+ 1指出「不要使用assert'這個(或其他很多東西)」 – SingleNegationElimination 2011-08-02 18:05:53
@TokenMacGuy,理想情況下,它應該是一個錯誤的子類,如果你試圖與之交互系統已鎖定的文件 - 我只是不確定是哪一個。 – 2011-08-02 18:19:38