像以前的答案,這是預期的行爲提及。
到目前爲止唯一的工作是到driver.get("domain.com/404")
頁面。但是,這並不總是因爲工作經常SSO保護domain.com/*
我已經對規範中的一個新的功能要求:https://github.com/w3c/webdriver/issues/1238
使它所以404工作周圍總能工作。
The webdriver spec https://w3c.github.io/webdriver/webdriver-spec.html#add-cookie forces the current browser session to be on the domain where you are adding the cookie to.
This makes tons of sense and I agree with it.
This unfortunately prevents 2 key use cases:
You want to re-use cookies from another webdriver session in a new session to avoid repeating the work it took to get the cookies. Such as having to repeat a login. Allow a webdriver pool to be shared amongst unrelated threads where each thread might have their own cookies. The only current work around is to attempt to force the webdriver to go to a 404 error page with something like: webdriver.get(" http://the-cookie-domain.com/404adsfasdf "). This would cause the page to go to domain and would allow you to add cookies with addCookie. But this hardly ever works. Because the page is very often protected by SSO, any attempt to go to http://the-cookie-domain.com/ * sends you to an SSO login page e.g. http://login.ssodomain.com and now you have the same problem.
We should add a new method to the spec webdriver.goTo404Page(domain) to allow this use-case. This method should simulate a 404 HTTP status code response from domain in the browser.
Alternatively maybe be a new overload to addCookie could allow this, for example: void addCookie(Cookie var1, String goTo404PageOfDomain);
By allowing users to go to a fake 404 page of any given domain, this guarantees the 404-page workaround works for any page and these 2 use cases are now possible.
對於firefox,您可以稍微修改Marionette以刪除此檢查。
diff --git a/testing/marionette/cookie.js b/testing/marionette/cookie.js
--- a/testing/marionette/cookie.js
+++ b/testing/marionette/cookie.js
@@ -144,14 +144,14 @@ cookie.add = function(newCookie, {restri
newCookie.domain = "." + newCookie.domain;
}
- if (restrictToHost) {
- if (!restrictToHost.endsWith(newCookie.domain) &&
- ("." + restrictToHost) !== newCookie.domain &&
- restrictToHost !== newCookie.domain) {
- throw new InvalidCookieDomainError(`Cookies may only be set ` +
- `for the current domain (${restrictToHost})`);
- }
- }
+// if (restrictToHost) {
+// if (!restrictToHost.endsWith(newCookie.domain) &&
+// ("." + restrictToHost) !== newCookie.domain &&
+// restrictToHost !== newCookie.domain) {
+// throw new InvalidCookieDomainError(`Cookies may only be set ` +
+// `for the current domain (${restrictToHost})`);
+// }
+// }
// remove port from domain, if present.
// unfortunately this catches IPv6 addresses by mistake
diff --git a/testing/marionette/driver.js b/testing/marionette/driver.js
--- a/testing/marionette/driver.js
+++ b/testing/marionette/driver.js
@@ -2638,9 +2638,9 @@ GeckoDriver.prototype.addCookie = functi
let {protocol, hostname} = this.currentURL;
const networkSchemes = ["ftp:", "http:", "https:"];
- if (!networkSchemes.includes(protocol)) {
- throw new InvalidCookieDomainError("Document is cookie-averse");
- }
+// if (!networkSchemes.includes(protocol)) {
+// throw new InvalidCookieDomainError("Document is cookie-averse");
+// }
let newCookie = cookie.fromJSON(cmd.parameters.cookie);
diff --git a/testing/marionette/test_cookie.js b/testing/marionette/test_cookie.js
--- a/testing/marionette/test_cookie.js
+++ b/testing/marionette/test_cookie.js
@@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ add_test(function test_add() {
});
equal(2, cookie.manager.cookies.length);
- Assert.throws(() => {
- let biscuit = {name: "name3", value: "value3", domain: "domain3"};
- cookie.add(biscuit, {restrictToHost: "other domain"});
- }, /Cookies may only be set for the current domain/);
+// Assert.throws(() => {
+// let biscuit = {name: "name3", value: "value3", domain: "domain3"};
+// cookie.add(biscuit, {restrictToHost: "other domain"});
+// }, /Cookies may only be set for the current domain/);
cookie.add({
name: "name4",
根據錯誤:'你只能爲當前域設置Cookie'你不能那樣做。 – sircapsalot