這應該是一個簡單的問題,但由於某種原因,我遇到了麻煩。假設我有一個FragmentOne和FragmentTwo。 FragmentOne看起來是這樣的:Android:模板模式與片段
private static final String PATH_KEY = "path_key";
private Asset asset;
public FragmentOne() {
// Required empty public constructor
}
public static FragmentOne newInstance(Asset asset) {
FragmentOne fragment = new FragmentOne();
Bundle args = new Bundle();
args.putSerializable(PATH_KEY, asset);
fragment.setArguments(args);
return fragment;
}
@Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
if (getArguments() != null) {
asset = (Asset) getArguments().getSerializable(PATH_KEY);
}
}
@Override
public View onCreateView(final LayoutInflater inflater, final ViewGroup container,
final Bundle savedInstanceState) {
final FragmentOneBinding binding = DataBindingUtil
.inflate(inflater, R.layout.fragment_video, container, false);
bindAsset(binding, asset);
return binding.getRoot();
}
public void bindAsset(FragmentOneBinding binding, Asset asset) {
binding.textView.setText("FragOne displays asset like this " + asset.text);
//this is the only method which differs from FragmentTwo
}
而FragmentTwo看起來是這樣的:
private static final String PATH_KEY = "path_key";
private Asset asset;
public FragmentTwo() {
// Required empty public constructor
}
public static FragmentTwo newInstance(Asset asset) {
FragmentTwo fragment = new FragmentTwo();
Bundle args = new Bundle();
args.putSerializable(PATH_KEY, asset);
fragment.setArguments(args);
return fragment;
}
@Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
if (getArguments() != null) {
asset = (Asset) getArguments().getSerializable(PATH_KEY);
}
}
@Override
public View onCreateView(final LayoutInflater inflater, final ViewGroup container,
final Bundle savedInstanceState) {
final FragmentTwoBinding binding = DataBindingUtil
.inflate(inflater, R.layout.fragment_video, container, false);
bindAsset(binding, asset);
return binding.getRoot();
}
public void bindAsset(FragmentOneBinding binding, Asset asset) {
binding.textView.setText("But FragTwo, which is very different, displays asset like this " + asset.image.getName());
//this is the only method which differs from FragmentOne
}
正如你可以看到,在兩個片段,中的newInstance,的onCreate和onCreateView方法在結構上相同。唯一真正的區別是從兩個片段的onCreateView中調用的bindView方法是不一樣的。
使用泛型,抽象類,接口或某些組合可以將事物簡化爲模板設計模式嗎?那麼下一次我想用完全相同的結構製作一個片段時,我可以做一些這樣的事情?
class FragmentThree extends TemplateFragment {
@Override
public void bindAsset(FragmentThreeBinding binding, Asset asset){
binding.textView.setText(asset.name);
}
}
我試圖使一個抽象類了,但你不能有一個抽象類的靜態方法,所以的newInstance()停止我在這裏。我嘗試了一些實現接口的方法,但沒有任何運氣。
你好。你是對的,採取你的方法確實有點簡化了代碼,儘管沒有我希望的那麼多。我會接受你的回答。但是,如果我需要將newInstance部分分解出來,那麼您推薦什麼?某種工廠類? (在我的情況下,FragmentOne,FragmentTwo和Fragment Three都在不同的FragmentSwitcher類中實例化,除了要切換到的片段類型外,它們在功能上都是相同的,將它們減少到單個通用切換器類會更好)。 – ike
此FragmentSwitcher類是否創建相同片段類的多個實例,或者它是否可以在單個實例中運行? –
@ike理想情況下,你應該發佈一個新的問題與這個鏈接。 –