2
我有可能是網絡驅動器上的數據庫。 有兩件事情，我想實現：SQLite的連接策略
- 當第一個用戶以只讀模式連接到它（他不 有位置的讀寫訪問，或者數據庫 只讀），其他用戶也必須使用只讀連接（如果他們具有RW訪問，則即使爲 ）。
- 當第一個用戶在RW模式連接到它，別人無法 連接到數據庫的。
我正在使用SQLite，併發性不應該是問題，因爲數據庫不應該被超過10人同時使用。
更新：這是一個我正在努力工作的示例，所以我可以在程序本身中實現它。幾乎所有東西都可以改變。
UPDATE：現在，當我終於明白了什麼@CL。告訴我，我做了它的工作，這是更新的代碼。
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Linq;
using System.IO;
using DbSample.Domain;
using DbSample.Infrastructure;
using NHibernate.Linq;
using NHibernate.Util;
namespace DbSample.Console
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
IDatabaseContext databaseContext = null;
databaseContext = new SqliteDatabaseContext(args[1]);
var connection = LockDB(args[1]);
if (connection == null) return;
var sessionFactory = databaseContext.CreateSessionFactory();
if (sessionFactory != null)
{
int insertCount = 0;
while (true)
{
try
{
using (var session = sessionFactory.OpenSession(connection))
{
string result;
session.FlushMode = NHibernate.FlushMode.Never;
var command = session.Connection.CreateCommand();
command.CommandText = "PRAGMA locking_mode=EXCLUSIVE";
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
using (var transaction = session.BeginTransaction(ReadCommited))
{
bool update = false;
bool delete = false;
bool read = false;
bool readall = false;
int op = 0;
System.Console.Write("\nMenu of the day:\n1: update\n2: delete\n3: read\n4: read all\n0: EXIT\n\nYour choice: ");
op = System.Convert.ToInt32(System.Console.ReadLine());
if (op == 1)
update = true;
else if (op == 2)
delete = true;
else if (op == 3)
read = true;
else if (op == 4)
readall = true;
else if (op == 0)
break;
else System.Console.WriteLine("Are you retarded? Can't you read?");
if (delete)
{
System.Console.Write("Enter the ID of the object to delete: ");
var objectToRemove = session.Get<MyObject>(System.Convert.ToInt32(System.Console.ReadLine()));
if (!(objectToRemove == null))
{
session.Delete(objectToRemove);
System.Console.WriteLine("Deleted {0}, ID: {1}", objectToRemove.MyName, objectToRemove.Id);
deleteCount++;
}
else
System.Console.WriteLine("\nObject not present in the database!\n");
}
else if (update)
{
System.Console.Write("How many objects to add/update? ");
int number = System.Convert.ToInt32(System.Console.ReadLine());
number += insertCount;
for (; insertCount < number; insertCount++)
{
var myObject = session.Get<MyObject>(insertCount + 1);
if (myObject == null)
{
myObject = new MyObject
{
MtName = "Object" + insertCount,
IdLegacy = 0,
};
session.Save(myObject);
System.Console.WriteLine("Added {0}, ID: {1}", myObject.MyName, myObject.Id);
}
else
{
session.Update(myObject);
System.Console.WriteLine("Updated {0}, ID: {1}", myObject.MyName, myObject.Id);
}
}
}
else if (read)
{
System.Console.Write("Enter the ID of the object to read: ");
var objectToRead = session.Get<MyObject>(System.Convert.ToInt32(System.Console.ReadLine()));
if (!(objectToRead == null))
System.Console.WriteLine("Got {0}, ID: {1}", objectToRead.MyName, objectToRead.Id);
else
System.Console.WriteLine("\nObject not present in the database!\n");
}
else if (readall)
{
System.Console.Write("How many objects to read? ");
int number = System.Convert.ToInt32(System.Console.ReadLine());
for (int i = 0; i < number; i++)
{
var objectToRead = session.Get<MyObject>(i + 1);
if (!(objectToRead == null))
System.Console.WriteLine("Got {0}, ID: {1}", objectToRead.MyName, objectToRead.Id);
else
System.Console.WriteLine("\nObject not present in the database! ID: {0}\n", i + 1);
}
}
update = false;
delete = false;
read = false;
readall = false;
transaction.Commit();
}
}
}
catch (System.Exception e)
{
throw e;
}
}
sessionFactory.Close();
}
}
private static SQLiteConnection LockDbNew(string database)
{
var fi = new FileInfo(database);
if (!fi.Exists)
return null;
var builder = new SQLiteConnectionStringBuilder { DefaultTimeout = 1, DataSource = fi.FullName, Version = 3 };
var connectionStr = builder.ToString();
var connection = new SQLiteConnection(connectionStr) { DefaultTimeout = 1 };
var cmd = new SQLiteCommand(connection);
connection.Open();
// try to get an exclusive lock on the database
try
{
cmd.CommandText = "PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE; BEGIN EXCLUSIVE; COMMIT;";
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
// if we can't get the exclusive lock, it could mean 3 things
// 1: someone else has locked the database
// 2: we don't have a write acces to the database location
// 3: database itself is a read-only file
// So, we try to connect as read-only
catch (Exception)
{
// we try to set the SHARED lock
try
{
// first we clear the locks
cmd.CommandText = "PRAGMA locking_mode = NORMAL";
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
cmd.CommandText = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM MyObject";
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
// then set the SHARED lock on the database
cmd.CommandText = "PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE";
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
cmd.CommandText = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM MyObject";
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
readOnly = true;
}
catch (Exception)
{
// if we can't set EXCLUSIVE nor SHARED lock, someone else has opened the DB in read-write mode and we can't connect at all
connection.Close();
return null;
}
}
return connection;
}
}
}
是的，這將解決第二部分，但第一部分呢？你有什麼想法？ – gajo357 2013-02-11 08:14:11
共享（只讀）鎖可防止寫入鎖定。 – 2013-02-11 09:30:42
這與解決方案非常接近，但我遇到了一個問題。如果我將它設置爲EXCLUSIVE，則在第一次讀取之後獲得SHARED鎖定，這對於所有用戶都能夠讀取它是很好的。但是，如果我嘗試寫幾次讀後，我會得到「數據庫已鎖定」異常，因爲SHARED鎖在數據庫中，即使它仍然是相同的用戶。我在每個操作之後都執行Transaction.Commit（），並且Session.FlushMode = Commit。 – gajo357 2013-02-11 13:01:29