2013-12-11 52 views
1

這個問題是對my previous question about unusual exceptions generated by a custom security manager.的一個跟進。在高層次上,我有興趣構建一個運行可信代碼和非可信代碼的應用程序。我最初的想法是建立一個不允許大多數操作運行的自定義SecurityManager。這導致了不尋常的行爲,在16次調用之後,可信反射代碼實例化不可信對象失敗。爲什麼這個看似等價的SecurityManager代碼會導致虛假異常?

我重寫了代碼,以便代替使用自定義SecurityManager來處理此問題,而是創建一個新的保護域,其中運行不受信任的代碼,然後從該不受信任的代碼剝離權限。這個新的代碼如下所示:

import java.io.FilePermission; 
import java.lang.reflect.*; 
import java.security.*; 

public class Main { 
    /* Track how many instances have been created so that we can see when the exception 
    * is thrown. 
    */ 
    private static int numInstances = 0; 
    public Main() { 
     System.out.println("Number created: " + ++numInstances); 
    } 

    /* Utility function that returns a Constructor object for main. */ 
    private static Constructor<Main> getCtor() { 
     try { 
      return Main.class.getConstructor(); 
     } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) { 
      e.printStackTrace(); 
      System.exit(-1); 
      return null; // Unreachable, needed to appease compiler. 
     } 
    } 

    /* Utility function that creates an AccessControlContext that only has file 
    * read permissions. 
    */ 
    private static AccessControlContext getContext() { 
     CodeSource c = new CodeSource(null, (java.security.cert.Certificate[])null); 
     Permissions permissions = new Permissions(); 

     /* Grant specific permission to read files. This is necessary, since otherwise the 
     * class loader can't read classes from disk. 
     */ 
     permissions.add(new FilePermission("*", "read")); 

     /* Construct an AccessControlContext from these permissions. */ 
     return new AccessControlContext(new ProtectionDomain[] {new ProtectionDomain(c, permissions)}); 
    } 

    public static void main(String[] args) { 
     /* Get a very restrictive AccessControlContext that does not allow for anything to run. */ 
     AccessControlContext noPermissions = getContext(); 

     /* Install a standard security manager to enable security. */ 
     System.setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager()); 

     /* Sit in an infinite loop using reflection to create Main objects. This code is 
     * run in a context where its only permissions are file reading. 
     */ 
     AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Void>() { 
      @Override 
      public Void run() { 
       /* Continuously create new Main objects. */ 
       Constructor<Main> ctor = getCtor(); 
       try { 
        while (true) { 
         ctor.newInstance(); 
        } 
       } catch (Exception e) { 
        e.printStackTrace(); 
        return null; 
       } 
      } 
     }, noPermissions); 

    } 
} 

此代碼現在工作完全正常 - 它構造各種Main對象不用任何麻煩。

我很困惑的是以下內容。爲了讓AccessController有任何牙齒,我們需要打開安全管理器。我通過調用

/* Install a standard security manager to enable security. */ 
System.setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager()); 

現在做這個,假設我改變了這個從默認SecurityManager這個定製SecurityManager

/* Install a standard security manager to enable security. */ 
System.setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager() { 
    @Override 
    public void checkPermission(Permission p) { 
     /* Log the permission. */ 
     System.out.println("Checking " + p); 
     super.checkPermission(p); 
    } 
}); 

SecurityManager等同於前,除了它記錄發生在什麼會檢查權限,然後將請求轉發到默認SecurityManager

如果我有這樣的變化和運行程序,我現在得到相同的行爲之前:

Checking ("java.io.FilePermission" "/home/keith/Documents/secret-eclipse-workspace/Security Manager Test/bin/Main$2.class" "read") 
Checking ("java.io.FilePermission" "/home/keith/Documents/secret-eclipse-workspace/Security Manager Test/bin/Main$2.class" "read") 
Checking ("java.io.FilePermission" "/home/keith/Documents/secret-eclipse-workspace/Security Manager Test/bin/Main$2.class" "read") 
Number created: 1 
Number created: 2 
Number created: 3 
Number created: 4 
Number created: 5 
Number created: 6 
Number created: 7 
Number created: 8 
Number created: 9 
Number created: 10 
Number created: 11 
Number created: 12 
Number created: 13 
Number created: 14 
Number created: 15 
Checking ("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "createClassLoader") 
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied ("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "createClassLoader") 
    at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:372) 
    at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:559) 
    at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:549) 
    at Main$1.checkPermission(Main.java:51) 
    at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkCreateClassLoader(SecurityManager.java:611) 
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.checkCreateClassLoader(ClassLoader.java:274) 
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.<init>(ClassLoader.java:316) 
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingClassLoader.<init>(ClassDefiner.java:72) 
    at sun.reflect.ClassDefiner$1.run(ClassDefiner.java:60) 
    at sun.reflect.ClassDefiner$1.run(ClassDefiner.java:58) 
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) 
    at sun.reflect.ClassDefiner.defineClass(ClassDefiner.java:57) 
    at sun.reflect.MethodAccessorGenerator$1.run(MethodAccessorGenerator.java:399) 
    at sun.reflect.MethodAccessorGenerator$1.run(MethodAccessorGenerator.java:396) 
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) 
    at sun.reflect.MethodAccessorGenerator.generate(MethodAccessorGenerator.java:395) 
    at sun.reflect.MethodAccessorGenerator.generateConstructor(MethodAccessorGenerator.java:94) 
    at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:48) 
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) 
    at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526) 
    at Main$2.run(Main.java:65) 
    at Main$2.run(Main.java:1) 
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) 
    at Main.main(Main.java:58) 

爲什麼我之前使用這個自定義SecurityManager後得到不同的行爲?我不明白爲什麼這些程序會在這些情況下產生不同的結果,因爲在這兩種情況下,默認SecurityManager是實際進行所有安全檢查的那個。

謝謝!

回答

1

您的SecurityManager中的代碼似乎不可信。所以當它在堆棧檢查過程中出現時,安全檢查將會失敗。

爲什麼代碼mainrun導致相同的問題?我們可以從堆棧跟蹤中看到安全檢查中涉及的堆棧元素。

at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:372) 
at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:559) 
at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:549) 
at Main$1.checkPermission(Main.java:51) 
at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkCreateClassLoader(SecurityManager.java:611) 
at java.lang.ClassLoader.checkCreateClassLoader(ClassLoader.java:274) 
at java.lang.ClassLoader.<init>(ClassLoader.java:316) 
at sun.reflect.DelegatingClassLoader.<init>(ClassDefiner.java:72) 
at sun.reflect.ClassDefiner$1.run(ClassDefiner.java:60) 
at sun.reflect.ClassDefiner$1.run(ClassDefiner.java:58) 
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) 
at sun.reflect.ClassDefiner.defineClass(ClassDefiner.java:57) 

唯一的非系統框架是Main$1.checkPermission(Main.java:51)。刪除它,問題消失。

+0

謝謝!我將如何使該代碼可信?或者我應該尋找一種完全不同的方法? – templatetypedef

+0

@templatetypedef通常,您將在策略文件中授予代碼庫java.security.AllPermission。 –

相關問題