我結束了以下解決方案。我發現在qestion of Nathan Ridley一個提示:
/// <summary>
/// Helper class for analyzing a type.
/// </summary>
public static class TypeAnalyzer
{
/// <summary>
/// Calculates if the given type is a "simple" type.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="type">Type to be checked for simplicity.</param>
/// <returns>True, if the type is "simple";false otherwise.</returns>
/// <remarks>
/// The following types are assumed to be simple:
/// <list type="*">
/// <item>string</item>
/// <item>int</item>
/// <item>decimal</item>
/// <item>float</item>
/// <item><see cref="StringComparison"/> (enum type)</item>
/// <item>int? (nullable simple types)</item>
/// </list>
/// The following types are not simple:
/// <list type="*">
/// <item>Point (struct)</item>
/// <item>Point? (nullable struct)</item>
/// <item>StringBuilder (class)</item>
/// </list>
/// </remarks>
public static bool IsSimple(this Type type)
{
if (IsNullableType(type))
return IsNestedTypeSimple(type);
return type.IsPrimitive
|| type.IsEnum
|| type.Equals(typeof(string))
|| type.Equals(typeof(decimal))
|| type.Equals(typeof(DateTime))
|| type.Equals(typeof(Guid));
}
private static bool IsNestedTypeSimple(Type type)
{
var nestedType = Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(type);
return IsSimple(nestedType);
}
private static bool IsNullableType(Type type)
{
return Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(type) != null;
}
}
寫在NUnit測試案例有:
[TestFixture]
public class TypeAnalyzerTests
{
[TestCase(typeof(string), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(int), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(decimal), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(float), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(StringComparison), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(int?), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(decimal?), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(StringComparison?), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(object), false)]
[TestCase(typeof(Point), false)]
[TestCase(typeof(Point?), false)]
[TestCase(typeof(StringBuilder), false)]
[TestCase(typeof(DateTime), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(Guid), true)]
[TestCase(typeof(Guid?), true)]
public void IsSimple_WhenCalledForType_ReturnsExpectedResult(Type type, bool expectedResult)
{
var isSimple = TypeAnalyzer.IsSimple(type);
Assert.That(isSimple, Is.EqualTo(expectedResult));
}
}
最後我改變了在問題中提到的方法:
private bool IsLinkedProperty()
{
return (_propertyInfo != null) && !_propertyInfo.PropertyType.IsSimple();
}
可以定義確定是否應該調用該方法的標準? – stuartd
你可以在這裏找到'SetLink'method:[link](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.services.client.dataservicecontext.setlink%28v=vs.113%29的.aspx)。據我所知,所有「原始」數據類型。 – scher
它在我看來,你將需要添加元數據(即屬性)到你的屬性知道何時調用該方法,以及爲參數傳遞什麼。 – stuartd