提升interprocess ipc死鎖

這是我的第二篇文章，與boost ipc庫有關。所以我想我會探討一些現有的例子可以在網絡上我面對莫名其妙的死鎖提升interprocess ipc死鎖

我現在的問題只是示例的審判提供@

http://en.highscore.de/cpp/boost/interprocesscommunication.html

#include <boost/interprocess/managed_shared_memory.hpp> 
#include <boost/interprocess/sync/named_mutex.hpp> 
#include <boost/interprocess/sync/named_condition.hpp> 
#include <boost/interprocess/sync/scoped_lock.hpp> 
#include <iostream> 

int main() 
{ 
    boost::interprocess::managed_shared_memory managed_shm(boost::interprocess::open_or_create, "shm", 1024); 
    int *i = managed_shm.find_or_construct<int>("Integer")(0); 
    boost::interprocess::named_mutex named_mtx(boost::interprocess::open_or_create, "mtx"); 
    boost::interprocess::named_condition named_cnd(boost::interprocess::open_or_create, "cnd"); 
    boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<boost::interprocess::named_mutex> lock(named_mtx); 
    while (*i < 10) 
    { 
    if (*i % 2 == 0) 
    { 
    ++(*i); 
    named_cnd.notify_all(); 
    named_cnd.wait(lock); 
    } 
    else 
    { 
    std::cout << *i << std::endl; 
    ++(*i); 
    named_cnd.notify_all(); 
    named_cnd.wait(lock); 
    } 
} 
named_cnd.notify_all(); 
boost::interprocess::shared_memory_object::remove("shm"); 
boost::interprocess::named_mutex::remove("mtx"); 
boost::interprocess::named_condition::remove("cnd"); 
}

這示例代碼導致我陷入僵局。 strace的指示兩種處理：