發送HTTP響應時,我應該用換行符(行分隔符)結束響應主體(內容本身)嗎?應該在http響應內容長度中包含換行符嗎?
如果是這樣,我應該在Content-Length中包含行分隔符的大小(我猜如果發送\ r \ n增加2的計數)?
發送HTTP響應時,我應該用換行符(行分隔符)結束響應主體(內容本身)嗎?應該在http響應內容長度中包含換行符嗎?
如果是這樣,我應該在Content-Length中包含行分隔符的大小(我猜如果發送\ r \ n增加2的計數)?
我沒有看到這樣的事情在RFC 2616:
Response = Status-Line ; Section 6.1 *((general-header ; Section 4.5 | response-header ; Section 6.2 | entity-header) CRLF) ; Section 7.1 CRLF [ message-body ] ; Section 7.2
有一個響應兩個新行,都是在頭文件的末尾,而不是在消息體的結束。標題將描述消息體如何終止。
發送HTTP響應時,我應該用換行符(行分隔符)結束響應主體( 內容本身)嗎?
RFC不要求您發送換行符。消息長度不是基於這種換行符的存在計算的。請參閱Message Length部分,其中描述瞭如何計算消息長度。
發送HTTP響應時,應該用換行符(行分隔符)結束響應主體(內容本身)嗎?如果是這樣,我應該在內容長度中包含行分隔符的大小(我猜如果發送\ r \ n增加2的計數)?
NO!
在HTTP響應的消息體中發送的資源數據可能包含自己的換行符(正如文本文件中常見的那樣),但就HTTP本身而言,它是任意數據。消息數據內的換行符不是HTTP響應本身的一部分。除非使用Transfer-Encoding
(在這種情況下Content-Length
被忽略,並且使用chunked
編碼,該編碼被自我終止),否則HTTP響應終止達到Content-Length
(這是資源數據的字節大小),或者連接是在迴應結束時關閉。這在RFC 2616 Section 4.4中描述:
4.4 Message Length The transfer-length of a message is the length of the message-body as it appears in the message; that is, after any transfer-codings have been applied. When a message-body is included with a message, the transfer-length of that body is determined by one of the following (in order of precedence): 1.Any response message which "MUST NOT" include a message-body (such as the 1xx, 204, and 304 responses and any response to a HEAD request) is always terminated by the first empty line after the header fields, regardless of the entity-header fields present in the message. 2.If a Transfer-Encoding header field (section 14.41) is present and has any value other than "identity", then the transfer-length is defined by use of the "chunked" transfer-coding (section 3.6), unless the message is terminated by closing the connection. 3.If a Content-Length header field (section 14.13) is present, its decimal value in OCTETs represents both the entity-length and the transfer-length. The Content-Length header field MUST NOT be sent if these two lengths are different (i.e., if a Transfer-Encoding header field is present). If a message is received with both a Transfer-Encoding header field and a Content-Length header field, the latter MUST be ignored. 4.If the message uses the media type "multipart/byteranges", and the transfer-length is not otherwise specified, then this self- delimiting media type defines the transfer-length. This media type MUST NOT be used unless the sender knows that the recipient can parse it; the presence in a request of a Range header with multiple byte- range specifiers from a 1.1 client implies that the client can parse multipart/byteranges responses. A range header might be forwarded by a 1.0 proxy that does not understand multipart/byteranges; in this case the server MUST delimit the message using methods defined in items 1,3 or 5 of this section. 5.By the server closing the connection. (Closing the connection cannot be used to indicate the end of a request body, since that would leave no possibility for the server to send back a response.) For compatibility with HTTP/1.0 applications, HTTP/1.1 requests containing a message-body MUST include a valid Content-Length header field unless the server is known to be HTTP/1.1 compliant. If a request contains a message-body and a Content-Length is not given, the server SHOULD respond with 400 (bad request) if it cannot determine the length of the message, or with 411 (length required) if it wishes to insist on receiving a valid Content-Length. All HTTP/1.1 applications that receive entities MUST accept the "chunked" transfer-coding (section 3.6), thus allowing this mechanism to be used for messages when the message length cannot be determined in advance. Messages MUST NOT include both a Content-Length header field and a non-identity transfer-coding. If the message does include a non- identity transfer-coding, the Content-Length MUST be ignored. When a Content-Length is given in a message where a message-body is allowed, its field value MUST exactly match the number of OCTETs in the message-body. HTTP/1.1 user agents MUST notify the user when an invalid length is received and detected.