我搜索了很多問題,但唯一可以找到的答案是重構onCreate中的代碼以啓用快速啓動。但這個問題在我的情況下看起來不同。 我和我的團隊成員正在研究通過GITHUB同步的代碼,由他製作的構建在Flash中打開,由我製作的構建需要超過10秒才能啓動。 另一個問題,他的構建是90MB左右,我的構建只有30MB。應用程序無論如何功能齊全,但啓動時間和構建尺寸的差異太大。Android應用程序啓動時間過長
我不確定他的系統配置,但我使用JAVA8編譯,SDK 24和Gradle 2.10來構建應用程序。
這裏是我的gradle這個文件
buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
/*flatDir {
dirs 'libs'
}*/
maven { url 'https://maven.fabric.io/public' }
}
dependencies {
//compile(name:'library-release', ext:'aar')
classpath 'io.realm:realm-gradle-plugin:0.88.0'
classpath 'io.fabric.tools:gradle:1.21.2'
}
}
apply plugin: 'com.android.application'
apply plugin: 'realm-android'
apply plugin: 'io.fabric'
repositories {
maven { url 'https://maven.fabric.io/public' }
}
android {
compileSdkVersion 24
buildToolsVersion '24.0.0'
useLibrary 'org.apache.http.legacy'
dexOptions {
maxProcessCount 4 // this is the default value
javaMaxHeapSize "4g"
dexInProcess = false
}
defaultConfig {
applicationId "com.sample.app"
minSdkVersion 21
targetSdkVersion 24
versionCode 31
versionName "1.0"
multiDexEnabled true
testInstrumentationRunner "android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner"
}
buildTypes {
/*debug {
minifyEnabled true
useProguard false
}*/
release {
minifyEnabled false
proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
}
}
sourceSets {
main {
java.srcDirs = ['src/main/java']
}
robolectric {
java.srcDir file('src/test/java/')
}
}
}
dependencies {
compile fileTree(include: ['*.jar'], dir: 'libs')
compile('com.twitter.sdk.android:twitter:[email protected]') {
transitive = true;
}
testCompile 'org.robolectric:shadows-play-services:3.0'
testCompile 'org.robolectric:shadows-support-v4:3.0'
testCompile 'org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:1.6.2'
testCompile 'org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4-rule:1.6.2'
testCompile 'org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:1.6.2'
testCompile 'org.powermock:powermock-classloading-xstream:1.6.2'
testCompile 'junit:junit:4.12'
testCompile 'org.robolectric:robolectric:3.0'
testCompile 'org.assertj:assertj-core:1.7.0'
androidTestCompile 'com.android.support:support-annotations:24.0.0'
androidTestCompile 'com.android.support.test:runner:0.4'
androidTestCompile 'com.android.support.test:rules:0.4'
androidTestCompile 'com.android.support.test.espresso:espresso-core:2.2.1'
compile('com.crashlytics.sdk.android:crashlytics:[email protected]') {
transitive = true;
}
// compile(group: 'com.google.gms', name: 'google-services', version: '2.0.0-beta4', ext: 'pom')
//apply plugin: 'com.android.application'
compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services:9.2.1'
compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-location:9.2.1'
compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-gcm:9.2.1'
compile 'com.mcxiaoke.volley:library:1.0.15'
compile 'com.github.bumptech.glide:glide:3.7.0'
compile 'com.android.support:support-v4:24.0.0'
compile 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:24.0.0'
compile 'com.android.support:design:24.0.0'
compile 'com.android.support:recyclerview-v7:24.0.0'
compile 'com.facebook.android:facebook-android-sdk:4.7.0'
compile 'com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp:3.2.0'
compile 'com.coinbase.android:coinbase-android-sdk:1.0.1'
compile 'org.roboguice:roboguice:2.0'
compile 'pl.droidsonroids.gif:android-gif-drawable:1.1.14'
compile 'com.sprylab.android.texturevideoview:texturevideoview:1.1.1'
compile 'com.google.code.gson:gson:2.4'
compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-ads:9.2.1'
compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-auth:9.2.1'
}
//put 'com.google.gms.google-services' plugin at the bottom
apply plugin: 'com.google.gms.google-services'
APK的大小不應該是那麼不同!知道他正在使用哪個IDE /版本,以及如果你們兩個都使用相同的資源等等可能是有用的.30和90MB大小似乎很奇怪。 – Sufian
是的,我知道@Sufian,我們已經匹配資源,他們幾乎一樣。我們都使用Android Studio 2.1.2 –
請參閱此主題以及http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22064591/apk-size-is-bigger-than-expected-android-studio – Sufian