我遇到了一個問題,即從HttpResponseStream讀取失敗,因爲我正在打包的StreamReader讀取速度更快,響應流獲取實際響應。我正在檢索一個相當小的文件(大約60k),但將響應處理爲實際對象的解析器失敗,因爲它遇到了一個意外的字符(代碼65535),根據經驗,我知道這是從您閱讀StreamReader並沒有可用的其他字符。從HttpResponseStream讀取失敗
對於記錄,我知道返回的內容是有效的,並且會正確解析,因爲每次運行代碼時文件中的不同位置發生故障。這是parser.Load()行,它在下面失敗。
有沒有一種方法可以確保我在嘗試解析它之前已經讀取了所有內容:將響應流複製到MemoryStream或字符串中,然後處理它?
/// <summary>
/// Makes a Query where the expected Result is an RDF Graph ie. CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE Queries
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sparqlQuery">SPARQL Query String</param>
/// <returns>RDF Graph</returns>
public Graph QueryWithResultGraph(String sparqlQuery)
{
try
{
//Build the Query URI
StringBuilder queryUri = new StringBuilder();
queryUri.Append(this._endpoint.ToString());
queryUri.Append("?query=");
queryUri.Append(Uri.EscapeDataString(sparqlQuery));
if (!this._defaultGraphUri.Equals(String.Empty))
{
queryUri.Append("&default-graph-uri=");
queryUri.Append(Uri.EscapeUriString(this._defaultGraphUri));
}
//Make the Query via HTTP
HttpWebResponse httpResponse = this.DoQuery(new Uri(queryUri.ToString()),false);
//Set up an Empty Graph ready
Graph g = new Graph();
g.BaseURI = this._endpoint;
//Parse into a Graph based on Content Type
String ctype = httpResponse.ContentType;
IRDFReader parser = MIMETypesHelper.GetParser(ctype);
parser.Load(g, new StreamReader(httpResponse.GetResponseStream()));
return g;
}
catch (UriFormatException uriEx)
{
//URI Format Invalid
throw new Exception("The format of the URI was invalid", uriEx);
}
catch (WebException webEx)
{
//Some sort of HTTP Error occurred
throw new Exception("A HTTP Error occurred", webEx);
}
catch (RDFException)
{
//Some problem with the RDF or Parsing thereof
throw;
}
catch (Exception)
{
//Other Exception
throw;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Internal Helper Method which executes the HTTP Requests against the SPARQL Endpoint
/// </summary>
/// <param name="target">URI to make Request to</param>
/// <param name="sparqlOnly">Indicates if only SPARQL Result Sets should be accepted</param>
/// <returns>HTTP Response</returns>
private HttpWebResponse DoQuery(Uri target, bool sparqlOnly)
{
//Expect errors in this function to be handled by the calling function
//Set-up the Request
HttpWebRequest httpRequest;
HttpWebResponse httpResponse;
httpRequest = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create(target);
//Use HTTP GET/POST according to user set preference
if (!sparqlOnly)
{
httpRequest.Accept = MIMETypesHelper.HTTPAcceptHeader();
//For the time being drop the application/json as this doesn't play nice with Virtuoso
httpRequest.Accept = httpRequest.Accept.Replace("," + MIMETypesHelper.JSON[0], String.Empty);
}
else
{
httpRequest.Accept = MIMETypesHelper.HTTPSPARQLAcceptHeader();
}
httpRequest.Method = this._httpMode;
httpRequest.Timeout = this._timeout;
//HTTP Debugging
if (Options.HTTPDebugging)
{
Tools.HTTPDebugRequest(httpRequest);
}
httpResponse = (HttpWebResponse)httpRequest.GetResponse();
//HTTP Debugging
if (Options.HTTPDebugging)
{
Tools.HTTPDebugResponse(httpResponse);
}
return httpResponse;
}
編輯
爲了澄清什麼,我已經說過這是不在分析器中的錯誤,這是StreamReader的讀取速度比響應流中提供數據的問題。我可以解決這個問題通過執行以下操作,但想更好或更優雅的解決方案的建議:
//Parse into a Graph based on Content Type
String ctype = httpResponse.ContentType;
IRDFReader parser = MIMETypesHelper.GetParser(ctype);
Stream response = httpResponse.GetResponseStream();
MemoryStream temp = new MemoryStream();
Tools.StreamCopy(response, temp);
response.Close();
temp.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
parser.Load(g, new StreamReader(temp));
編輯2
BlockingStreamReader類按埃蒙的建議:
/// <summary>
/// A wrapper to a Stream which does all its Read() and Peek() calls using ReadBlock() to handle slow underlying streams (eg Network Streams)
/// </summary>
public sealed class BlockingStreamReader : StreamReader
{
private bool _peeked = false;
private int _peekChar = -1;
public BlockingStreamReader(StreamReader reader) : base(reader.BaseStream) { }
public BlockingStreamReader(Stream stream) : base(stream) { }
public override int Read()
{
if (this._peeked)
{
this._peeked = false;
return this._peekChar;
}
else
{
if (this.EndOfStream) return -1;
char[] cs = new char[1];
base.ReadBlock(cs, 0, 1);
return cs[0];
}
}
public override int Peek()
{
if (this._peeked)
{
return this._peekChar;
}
else
{
if (this.EndOfStream) return -1;
this._peeked = true;
char[] cs = new char[1];
base.ReadBlock(cs, 0, 1);
this._peekChar = cs[0];
return this._peekChar;
}
}
public new bool EndOfStream
{
get
{
return (base.EndOfStream && !this._peeked);
}
}
}
編輯3
這是一個很好的解決方案n可以包裝任何TextReader
並提供EndOfStream
屬性。它使用內部緩衝區,在包裝的TextReader
上使用ReadBlock()
填充。所有閱讀()讀者的方法可以在使用此緩衝區定義,緩衝區大小是可配置的:
/// <summary>
/// The BlockingTextReader is an implementation of a <see cref="TextReader">TextReader</see> designed to wrap other readers which may or may not have high latency.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// This is designed to avoid premature detection of end of input when the input has high latency and the consumer tries to read from the input faster than it can return data. All methods are defined by using an internal buffer which is filled using the <see cref="TextReader.ReadBlock">ReadBlock()</see> method of the underlying <see cref="TextReader">TextReader</see>
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
public sealed class BlockingTextReader : TextReader
{
private char[] _buffer;
private int _pos = -1;
private int _bufferAmount = -1;
private bool _finished = false;
private TextReader _reader;
public const int DefaultBufferSize = 1024;
public BlockingTextReader(TextReader reader, int bufferSize)
{
if (reader == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("reader", "Cannot read from a null TextReader");
if (bufferSize < 1) throw new ArgumentException("bufferSize must be >= 1", "bufferSize");
this._reader = reader;
this._buffer = new char[bufferSize];
}
public BlockingTextReader(TextReader reader)
: this(reader, DefaultBufferSize) { }
public BlockingTextReader(Stream input, int bufferSize)
: this(new StreamReader(input), bufferSize) { }
public BlockingTextReader(Stream input)
: this(new StreamReader(input)) { }
private void FillBuffer()
{
this._pos = -1;
if (this._finished)
{
this._bufferAmount = 0;
}
else
{
this._bufferAmount = this._reader.ReadBlock(this._buffer, 0, this._buffer.Length);
if (this._bufferAmount == 0 || this._bufferAmount < this._buffer.Length) this._finished = true;
}
}
public override int ReadBlock(char[] buffer, int index, int count)
{
if (count == 0) return 0;
if (buffer == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("buffer");
if (index < 0) throw new ArgumentException("index", "Index must be >= 0");
if (count < 0) throw new ArgumentException("count", "Count must be >= 0");
if ((buffer.Length - index) < count) throw new ArgumentException("Buffer too small");
if (this._bufferAmount == -1 || this._pos >= this._bufferAmount)
{
if (!this._finished)
{
this.FillBuffer();
if (this.EndOfStream) return 0;
}
else
{
return 0;
}
}
this._pos = Math.Max(0, this._pos);
if (count <= this._bufferAmount - this._pos)
{
//If we have sufficient things buffered to fufill the request just copy the relevant stuff across
Array.Copy(this._buffer, this._pos, buffer, index, count);
this._pos += count;
return count;
}
else
{
int copied = 0;
while (copied < count)
{
int available = this._bufferAmount - this._pos;
if (count < copied + available)
{
//We can finish fufilling this request this round
int toCopy = Math.Min(available, count - copied);
Array.Copy(this._buffer, this._pos, buffer, index + copied, toCopy);
copied += toCopy;
this._pos += toCopy;
return copied;
}
else
{
//Copy everything we currently have available
Array.Copy(this._buffer, this._pos, buffer, index + copied, available);
copied += available;
this._pos = this._bufferAmount;
if (!this._finished)
{
//If we haven't reached the end of the input refill our buffer and continue
this.FillBuffer();
if (this.EndOfStream) return copied;
this._pos = 0;
}
else
{
//Otherwise we have reached the end of the input so just return what we've managed to copy
return copied;
}
}
}
return copied;
}
}
public override int Read(char[] buffer, int index, int count)
{
return this.ReadBlock(buffer, index, count);
}
public override int Read()
{
if (this._bufferAmount == -1 || this._pos >= this._bufferAmount - 1)
{
if (!this._finished)
{
this.FillBuffer();
if (this.EndOfStream) return -1;
}
else
{
return -1;
}
}
this._pos++;
return (int)this._buffer[this._pos];
}
public override int Peek()
{
if (this._bufferAmount == -1 || this._pos >= this._bufferAmount - 1)
{
if (!this._finished)
{
this.FillBuffer();
if (this.EndOfStream) return -1;
}
else
{
return -1;
}
}
return (int)this._buffer[this._pos + 1];
}
public bool EndOfStream
{
get
{
return this._finished && (this._pos >= this._bufferAmount - 1);
}
}
public override void Close()
{
this._reader.Close();
}
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
this.Close();
this._reader.Dispose();
base.Dispose(disposing);
}
}
因此,在它推出九年後,你恰好是世界上第一個發現StreamReader的讀取速度比它想要讀取的Stream的速度更快的解決方案嗎? – 2009-08-12 09:33:17
不,我只是想知道是否有人有任何解決方案比上述更優雅 – RobV 2009-08-12 09:40:36
解決方案是什麼? StreamReader的讀取速度不及Stream的速度。 – 2009-08-12 09:49:28