完美正確的while循環無效的語法？

-7

我寫的樂趣（掛起的人）一個計劃，我得到這個while循環完美正確的while循環無效的語法？

while wrong MAX_WRONG and so_far != word:

我的整個程序incorrrect語法是這個

import random 
HANGMAN=(#this is the Hangman ascii art 
""" 
_________ 
    |   | 
    |   0 
    |   
    |   
    | 
    | 
_________ 
    |   | 
    |   0 
    |   | 
    |   
    | 
    | 
_________ 
    |   | 
    |   0 
    |  /|\\ 
    |   
    | 
    | 
_________ 
    |   | 
    |   0 
    |  /|\\ 
    |  /\\ 
    | 
    | 
""") 

MAX_WRONG=len(HANGMAN)-1 


WORDS=("OVERUSED","CLAM","BACON","PUCK","TAFFY") #these are the words 

word=random.choice(WORDS) #this is teh word that is going to be guessed 
so_far="-"*len(word)#where the orrect letteres are viewd 
wrong=0 
used=[]# the letters incorrectly guessed 

while wrong MAX_WRONG and so_far != word: 
    print HANGMAN[wrong] 
    print "YOu have used:\n",used 
    print "\nso far the word is:\n",so_far 

guess=raw_input("\n\nEnter your guess:") 
guess=guess.upper() 

while guess in used: 
    print "You have already guessed the letter".guess 
    guess=raw_input("enter your guess") 
    guess=guess.upper() 
    used.append(guess) 
if guess in word: 
    new="" 
    for i in range(len(word)): 
     if guess==word[i]: 
      new+=guess 
     else: 
      new+=so_far[i] 
    so_far=new 

else: 
    print "INCORRECT" 
    wrong+=1 
if wrong==MAX_WRONG: 
    print HANGMAN[wrong] 
else: 
    print "YAAAAY" 

    print "the word was",word

所有幫助表示讚賞！

來源

2011-12-11 Nick Krichevsky

「在完全正確的while循環無效的語法？」對我來說似乎並不正確。 – MByD

所以，除了反對票之外，我們可以得到一些選票嗎？： -/ – 2011-12-11 00:19:42

當編譯器說它不是一個好的策略時，聲稱代碼是正確的 - 大多數人都會相信編譯器。如果你說「幫我找到我的錯誤」，那麼下次你會得到更少的讚譽（我沒有堆積 - 7就夠了）。 – Dave

wrong MAX_WRONG沒有意義。這兩個標識符之間需要一個操作符。您可能正在尋找<。

來源

2011-12-11 00:06:09 icktoofay

就是這樣。失敗。：P –

while wrong < MAX_WRONG and so_far != word:

這是什麼意思？（注<比較）

來源

2011-12-11 00:06:01

我假設你的意思是... wrong < MAX_WRONG

來源

2011-12-11 00:06:13 MByD

wrong MAX_WORD是不正確的語法。也許你想wrong <= Max_Wrong

來源

2011-12-11 00:07:01 tobyodavies

完美正確的while循環無效的語法？

回答

相關問題