帕爾和親愛的社區,ANTLR4:差績效調用getInterpreter()adaptivePredict
當起初,我要感謝你們的驚人Antlr4(和ANTLR作爲一個整體:-))。 我過去6個月一直在使用Antlr 3(我已經非常開心),但是我更加喜歡antlr4。我注意到使用java作爲目標語言的語法簡單性和生成時間方面的重大改進。 不幸的是,我對運行時性能有一些擔憂,我沒有使用antlr3。
這裏我的語法的摘錄:
declare_specs
:
DECLARE? declare_spec+
|
DECLARE
;
declare_spec
:
constant_declaration
| variable_declaration
| exception_declaration
| procedure_body
| function_body
;
這裏所生成的代碼(I加入的System.out.println用於跟蹤):
public final Declare_specsContext declare_specs() throws RecognitionException {
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 1");
Declare_specsContext _localctx = new Declare_specsContext(_ctx, getState());
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 2");
enterRule(_localctx, 118, RULE_declare_specs);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 3");
int _la;
try {
int _alt;
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 4");
setState(826);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 5");
switch (getInterpreter().adaptivePredict(_input,69,_ctx)) {
case 1:
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 6");
enterOuterAlt(_localctx, 1);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 7");
{
if (f_trace >= f_trace_low) {
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - DECLARE_SPECS - FIRST ALT");
};
setState(817);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 8");
_la = _input.LA(1);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 9");
if (_la==DECLARE) {
{
setState(816); match(DECLARE);
}
}
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 10");
setState(820);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 11");
_errHandler.sync(this);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 12");
_alt = getInterpreter().adaptivePredict(_input,68,_ctx);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 13");
do {
switch (_alt) {
case 1:
{
{
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 14");
setState(819);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 15");
declare_spec();
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 16");
}
}
break;
default:
throw new NoViableAltException(this);
}
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 17");
setState(822);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 18");
_errHandler.sync(this);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 19");
_alt = getInterpreter().adaptivePredict(_input,68,_ctx);
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - declare_specs - 20");
} while (_alt!=2 && _alt!=-1);
}
break;
case 2:
enterOuterAlt(_localctx, 2);
{
if (f_trace >= f_trace_low) {
System.out.println("TIME: " + timestamp() + " - DECLARE_SPECS - SECOND ALT");
};
setState(825); match(DECLARE);
}
break;
}
}
catch (RecognitionException re) {
_localctx.exception = re;
_errHandler.reportError(this, re);
_errHandler.recover(this, re);
}
finally {
exitRule();
}
return _localctx;
}
這裏的痕跡:
................
TIME: 2013-02-06 09:47:10.417 - declare_specs - 12
TIME: 2013-02-06 09:47:11.023 - declare_specs - 13
.................
TIME: 2013-02-06 09:51:38.915 - DECLARE_SPEC - AFTER
.................
TIME: 2013-02-06 09:51:38.916 - declare_specs - 19
TIME: 2013-02-06 09:52:31.435 - declare_specs - 20
...................
TIME: 2013-02-06 09:52:31.435 - DECLARE_SPEC - INIT
當我調用_alt = getInterpreter()時,我輸了60''adaptivePredict(_input, 68,_ctx);第二次調用_alt = getInterpreter()時小於1'。adaptivePredict(_input,68,_ctx);第一次。 什麼改變當然是參數_input和_ctx。
問題可能出在我的語法上,但我在我的智慧結局;-)。 1.您可以告訴我我可能在哪裏尋找解決方案。 2.無論如何,adaptivePredict中發生了什麼;-)
謝謝你的幫助!
親切的問候,沃爾夫岡·錘
對不起,親愛的帕爾先生和尊敬的社區 –