您的foreach更改爲:
while (queueList.Count > 0)
{
Order orderItem = queueList.Dequeue();
Save(orderItem);
Console.WriteLine("Id :{0} Name {1} ", orderItem.Id, orderItem.Name);
}
編輯:
要重新處理,如果保存失敗做這樣的事情:
while (queueList.Count > 0)
{
Order orderItem = queueList.Dequeue();
if (!Save(orderItem))
{
queueList.Enqueue(orderItem); // Reprocess the failed save, probably want more logic to prevent infinite loop
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Successfully saved: {0} Name {1} ", orderItem.Id, orderItem.Name);
}
}
編輯:
約翰ķ提到線程安全這是一個有效的關注,如果你有多個線程訪問相同Queue
。涉及簡單線程安全問題的ThreadSafeQueue
類參見http://ccutilities.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/40529#678487。
編輯:這是我一直強調大家:-)
這裏提到的線程安全問題的範例線程安全的例子。如圖所示,默認Queue
可以「遺漏」物品,同時仍然減少計數。
更新:更好地表示問題。我絕不會將空項添加到Queue
,但標準Queue.Dequeue()
會返回多個空值。僅這一點就沒問題,但這樣做會從內部收集中刪除有效的項目,並減少Count
。這是一個安全的假設,在這個特定的例子中,從Queue.Dequeue()
操作返回的每個null
項表示一個從未處理過的有效項目。
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading;
namespace SO_ThreadSafeQueue
{
class Program
{
static int _QueueExceptions;
static int _QueueNull;
static int _QueueProcessed;
static int _ThreadSafeQueueExceptions;
static int _ThreadSafeQueueNull;
static int _ThreadSafeQueueProcessed;
static readonly Queue<Guid?> _Queue = new Queue<Guid?>();
static readonly ThreadSafeQueue<Guid?> _ThreadSafeQueue = new ThreadSafeQueue<Guid?>();
static readonly Random _Random = new Random();
const int Expected = 10000000;
static void Main()
{
Console.Clear();
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, 0);
Console.WriteLine("Creating queues...");
for (int i = 0; i < Expected; i++)
{
Guid guid = Guid.NewGuid();
_Queue.Enqueue(guid);
_ThreadSafeQueue.Enqueue(guid);
}
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, 0);
Console.WriteLine("Processing queues...");
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(ProcessQueue);
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(ProcessThreadSafeQueue);
}
int progress = 0;
while (_Queue.Count > 0 || _ThreadSafeQueue.Count > 0)
{
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, 0);
switch (progress)
{
case 0:
{
Console.WriteLine("Processing queues... |");
progress = 1;
break;
}
case 1:
{
Console.WriteLine("Processing queues... /");
progress = 2;
break;
}
case 2:
{
Console.WriteLine("Processing queues... -");
progress = 3;
break;
}
case 3:
{
Console.WriteLine("Processing queues... \\");
progress = 0;
break;
}
}
Thread.Sleep(200);
}
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, 0);
Console.WriteLine("Finished processing queues...");
Console.WriteLine("\r\nQueue Count: {0} Processed: {1, " + Expected.ToString().Length + "} Exceptions: {2,4} Null: {3}", _Queue.Count, _QueueProcessed, _QueueExceptions, _QueueNull);
Console.WriteLine("ThreadSafeQueue Count: {0} Processed: {1, " + Expected.ToString().Length + "} Exceptions: {2,4} Null: {3}", _ThreadSafeQueue.Count, _ThreadSafeQueueProcessed, _ThreadSafeQueueExceptions, _ThreadSafeQueueNull);
Console.WriteLine("\r\nPress any key...");
Console.ReadKey();
}
static void ProcessQueue(object nothing)
{
while (_Queue.Count > 0)
{
Guid? currentItem = null;
try
{
currentItem = _Queue.Dequeue();
}
catch (Exception)
{
Interlocked.Increment(ref _QueueExceptions);
}
if (currentItem != null)
{
Interlocked.Increment(ref _QueueProcessed);
}
else
{
Interlocked.Increment(ref _QueueNull);
}
Thread.Sleep(_Random.Next(1, 10)); // Simulate different workload times
}
}
static void ProcessThreadSafeQueue(object nothing)
{
while (_ThreadSafeQueue.Count > 0)
{
Guid? currentItem = null;
try
{
currentItem = _ThreadSafeQueue.Dequeue();
}
catch (Exception)
{
Interlocked.Increment(ref _ThreadSafeQueueExceptions);
}
if (currentItem != null)
{
Interlocked.Increment(ref _ThreadSafeQueueProcessed);
}
else
{
Interlocked.Increment(ref _ThreadSafeQueueNull);
}
Thread.Sleep(_Random.Next(1, 10)); // Simulate different workload times
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Represents a thread safe <see cref="Queue{T}"/>
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
public class ThreadSafeQueue<T> : Queue<T>
{
#region Private Fields
private readonly object _LockObject = new object();
#endregion
#region Public Properties
/// <summary>
/// Gets the number of elements contained in the <see cref="ThreadSafeQueue{T}"/>
/// </summary>
public new int Count
{
get
{
int returnValue;
lock (_LockObject)
{
returnValue = base.Count;
}
return returnValue;
}
}
#endregion
#region Public Methods
/// <summary>
/// Removes all objects from the <see cref="ThreadSafeQueue{T}"/>
/// </summary>
public new void Clear()
{
lock (_LockObject)
{
base.Clear();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Removes and returns the object at the beggining of the <see cref="ThreadSafeQueue{T}"/>
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
public new T Dequeue()
{
T returnValue;
lock (_LockObject)
{
returnValue = base.Dequeue();
}
return returnValue;
}
/// <summary>
/// Adds an object to the end of the <see cref="ThreadSafeQueue{T}"/>
/// </summary>
/// <param name="item">The object to add to the <see cref="ThreadSafeQueue{T}"/></param>
public new void Enqueue(T item)
{
lock (_LockObject)
{
base.Enqueue(item);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Set the capacity to the actual number of elements in the <see cref="ThreadSafeQueue{T}"/>, if that number is less than 90 percent of current capactity.
/// </summary>
public new void TrimExcess()
{
lock (_LockObject)
{
base.TrimExcess();
}
}
#endregion
}
}
}
嗨That works.What about if we want to dequeue the item only save if was successfull.Can I still do that? 抱歉+謝謝不熟悉隊列 – user9969 2010-02-06 19:54:27
@ devnet247:不是真的。如果您沒有將頂部的物品出列,那麼您無法得到頂部的物品。您需要將失敗的項目移動到隊列的_tail_,就像本示例所做的那樣。 – 2010-02-06 20:02:58
非常感謝您的幫助。現在這樣做。 我必須實現完整的線程,並且這個過程發生在wcf服務中。另一個要學習的事情。再次感謝 – user9969 2010-02-06 20:04:14