0
我有以下問題,下面的函數被調用時衝突被初始化爲NULL。傳遞指針數組的指針作爲參數
在foo結尾處,衝突採用正確的值。在這個例子中,*衝突應該包含值4,8和2.根據fprintfs,它會做什麼。
但是,當我在調用foo的函數中再次測試時(請參閱第二段代碼摘錄),衝突數組未被修改。我不知道爲什麼,因爲我傳遞了一個指向數組的指針,特別是因爲這種技術適用於multiDB和遞歸指針。任何幫助,將不勝感激。 (這不是完整的代碼,我只顯示了相關的部分)。謝謝!
int foo(
/*==================*/
uchar* buf,
uint* multiDB,
uint* recursive,
uint** conflict) {
select_consistent= conflict;
bool finished;
if (((start_of_scan == 1) && (*multiDB != 1)) || ((start_of_scan== 0) && (select_consistent == NULL))) {
fprintf(stderr, "Not doing select consistent \n ");
finished = TRUE;
}
else {
*multiDB=0;
fprintf(stderr, "Doing select consistent \n ");
finished = FALSE;
uint n;
int i = 0 ;
if (select_consistent == NULL) { /*This is the first round */
next_round = FALSE;
fp = popen("./algorithm '[t(1,[t(2,||),t(3,[t(8,||),t(10,||)])]).t(1,[t(4,||),t(6,||)]).t(1,[t(2,||),t(7,||)])]'", "r"); /* Issue the command. */
finished = FALSE;
}
if (next_round == TRUE) {
goto parse_records;
}
fscanf(fp, "%lu", &n);
uint* conflict_ ;
if (n!=0) conflict_ = (uint*) malloc(sizeof (uint) * n);
conflict = &conflict_;
next_round = TRUE;
int j= 0 ;
while (fscanf(fp, "%lu", &n) != EOF) {
if (n == 0) {
select_consistent=conflict;
goto parse_records;
}
else {
(*conflict)[j] = n;
}
i++;
j++;
}
finished = TRUE;
}
parse_records:;
int error;
.... [other code] foo2(multiDB, recursive);
fprintf(stderr, "Array states %lu %lu \n ", (*conflict)[0], (*conflict)[1]);
fprintf(stderr, "Array states %lu %lu \n ", (*select_consistent)[0], (*select_consistent)[1]);
return error
}
函數調用foo確實是這樣的:
uint** conflict = NULL ;
error = foo(buf, multiDB, recursive, conflict);
fprintf(stderr, "value is %lu \n", (*conflict)[0]); //This is still unitialised.