我已經寫了下面的測試來比較Linq2SQL和NHibernate的性能,我發現結果有點奇怪。映射非常簡單,兩者完全相同。兩者都針對現場數據庫運行。雖然我並未刪除Linq的廣告系列,但這不會影響性能超過10毫秒。Linq2SQL vs NHibernate的性能(我瘋了嗎?)
的Linq:
[Test]
public void Test1000ReadsWritesToAgentStateLinqPrecompiled()
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
Stopwatch swIn = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
swIn.Reset();
swIn.Start();
ReadWriteAndDeleteAgentStateWithLinqPrecompiled();
swIn.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("Run ReadWriteAndDeleteAgentState: " + swIn.ElapsedMilliseconds + " ms");
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("Total Time: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds + " ms");
Console.WriteLine("Average time to execute queries: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds/1000 + " ms");
}
private static readonly Func<AgentDesktop3DataContext, int, EntityModel.CampaignDetail>
GetCampaignById =
CompiledQuery.Compile<AgentDesktop3DataContext, int, EntityModel.CampaignDetail>(
(ctx, sessionId) => (from cd in ctx.CampaignDetails
join a in ctx.AgentCampaigns on cd.CampaignDetailId equals a.CampaignDetailId
where a.AgentStateId == sessionId
select cd).FirstOrDefault());
private void ReadWriteAndDeleteAgentStateWithLinqPrecompiled()
{
int id = 0;
using (var ctx = new AgentDesktop3DataContext())
{
EntityModel.AgentState agentState = new EntityModel.AgentState();
var campaign = new EntityModel.CampaignDetail { CampaignName = "Test" };
var campaignDisposition = new EntityModel.CampaignDisposition { Code = "123" };
campaignDisposition.Description = "abc";
campaign.CampaignDispositions.Add(campaignDisposition);
agentState.CallState = 3;
campaign.AgentCampaigns.Add(new AgentCampaign
{
AgentState = agentState
});
ctx.CampaignDetails.InsertOnSubmit(campaign);
ctx.AgentStates.InsertOnSubmit(agentState);
ctx.SubmitChanges();
id = agentState.AgentStateId;
}
using (var ctx = new AgentDesktop3DataContext())
{
var dbAgentState = ctx.GetAgentStateById(id);
Assert.IsNotNull(dbAgentState);
Assert.AreEqual(dbAgentState.CallState, 3);
var campaignDetails = GetCampaignById(ctx, id);
Assert.AreEqual(campaignDetails.CampaignDispositions[0].Description, "abc");
}
using (var ctx = new AgentDesktop3DataContext())
{
ctx.DeleteSessionById(id);
}
}
NHibernate的(環是一樣的):
private void ReadWriteAndDeleteAgentState()
{
var id = WriteAgentState().Id;
StartNewTransaction();
var dbAgentState = agentStateRepository.Get(id);
Assert.IsNotNull(dbAgentState);
Assert.AreEqual(dbAgentState.CallState, 3);
Assert.AreEqual(dbAgentState.Campaigns[0].Dispositions[0].Description, "abc");
var campaignId = dbAgentState.Campaigns[0].Id;
agentStateRepository.Delete(dbAgentState);
NHibernateSession.Current.Transaction.Commit();
Cleanup(campaignId);
NHibernateSession.Current.BeginTransaction();
}
結果:
NHibernate:
Total Time: 9469 ms
Average time to execute 13 queries: 9 ms
Linq:
Total Time: 127200 ms
Average time to execute 13 queries: 127 ms
LINQ的13.5倍丟了!具有預編譯查詢的事件(這兩個讀取查詢都是預編譯的)。
這不可能是正確的,但我期望NHibernate更快,這只是太大的差異,考慮映射是相同的,NHibernate實際上對數據庫執行更多的查詢。
更新。我重構了一個項目來使用NHibernate而不是Linq2Sql,並且與在相同映射上進行測試相比,性能增益似乎要低很多(大約20-30%)。有沒有人有他們自己的真實世界的例子?
你爲什麼感到驚訝?認識ORM(或自己寫)的人通常認爲LING(和EF)並不完全是「此行的頂級產品」;)3級嘗試。也許;) – TomTom 2010-05-13 07:07:42