2011-07-13 45 views
3

我正在實現一個應用程序的android和我遇到內存問題,同時填充從互聯網上的數據列表視圖。發生的一個奇怪的錯誤似乎是由於缺少recycling of the rows as it should normally happen而引起的,因爲它在Google I/O 2009處陳述。奇怪的行爲ListActivity和活動

當我在http://android.amberfog.com/?p=296上運行代碼時,一切都運行平穩,行視圖被回收並且listView被最佳地使用。

我現在想要在另一個活動裏面使用listView,裏面會有更多東西,因此僅僅擴展ListActivity的類是不夠的。所以,我有了下面的代碼的活動:

public class MultipleItemsList extends Activity { 
    private Context mContext; 
    private MyCustomAdapter mAdapter; 
    private ListView listView; 


    @Override 
    public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { 
     super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); 
     setContentView(R.layout.main); 
     mContext = this; 

     listView = (ListView) findViewById(R.id.listView); 

     mAdapter = new MyCustomAdapter(mContext); 

     for (int i = 1; i < 50; i++) { 
      mAdapter.addItem("item " + i); 
     } 

     listView.setAdapter(mAdapter); 
    } 
} 

main.xml中沒有什麼花哨的也是:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" 
    android:orientation="vertical" 
    android:layout_width="fill_parent" 
    android:layout_height="fill_parent"> 

    <TextView 
     android:layout_width="fill_parent" 
     android:layout_height="wrap_content" 
     android:text="@string/hello"/> 

    <ListView 
     android:id="@+id/listView" 
     android:layout_width="fill_parent" 
     android:layout_height="wrap_content"/> 

</LinearLayout> 

,以前的鏈接提出ListActivity如下:

public class MultipleItemsList extends ListActivity { 
    private Context mContext; 
    private MyCustomAdapter mAdapter; 
    private ListView listView; 


    @Override 
    public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { 
     super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); 
     mContext = this; 

     mAdapter = new MyCustomAdapter(mContext); 

     for (int i = 1; i < 50; i++) { 
      mAdapter.addItem("item " + i); 
     } 
     setListAdapter(mAdapter); 
    } 
} 

適配器在以下兩種情況下都適用:

public class MyCustomAdapter extends BaseAdapter { 
    private static final int TYPE_ITEM = 0; 
    private static final int TYPE_SEPARATOR = 1; 
    private static final int TYPE_MAX_COUNT = TYPE_SEPARATOR + 1; 

    private ArrayList<String> mData = new ArrayList<String>(); 
    private LayoutInflater mInflater; 

    private TreeSet<Integer> mSeparatorsSet = new TreeSet<Integer>(); 

    public static class ViewHolder { 
     public TextView textView; 
    } 

    public MyCustomAdapter(Context context) { 
     mInflater = LayoutInflater.from(context); 
    } 

    public void addItem(final String item) { 
     mData.add(item); 
     notifyDataSetChanged(); 
    } 

    public void addSeparatorItem(final String item) { 
     mData.add(item); 
     // save separator position 
     mSeparatorsSet.add(mData.size() - 1); 
     notifyDataSetChanged(); 
    } 

    @Override 
    public int getItemViewType(int position) { 
     return mSeparatorsSet.contains(position) ? TYPE_SEPARATOR : TYPE_ITEM; 
    } 

    @Override 
    public int getViewTypeCount() { 
     return TYPE_MAX_COUNT; 
    } 

    @Override 
    public int getCount() { 
     return mData.size(); 
    } 

    @Override 
    public String getItem(int position) { 
     return mData.get(position); 
    } 

    @Override 
    public long getItemId(int position) { 
     return position; 
    } 

    @Override 
    public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { 
     ViewHolder holder = null; 
     int type = getItemViewType(position); 
     Log.d("myCA", "getView " + position + " " + convertView + " type = " + type); 
     if (convertView == null) { 
      holder = new ViewHolder(); 
      switch (type) { 
       case TYPE_ITEM: 
        convertView = mInflater.inflate(R.layout.item1, null); 
        holder.textView = (TextView)convertView.findViewById(R.id.text); 
        break; 
       case TYPE_SEPARATOR: 
        convertView = mInflater.inflate(R.layout.item2, null); 
        holder.textView = (TextView)convertView.findViewById(R.id.textSeparator); 
        break; 
      } 
      convertView.setTag(holder); 
     } else { 
      holder = (ViewHolder)convertView.getTag(); 
     } 
     holder.textView.setText(mData.get(position)); 
     return convertView; 
    } 
} 

所以,我的問題是爲什麼在ListActivity的第二種情況下,視圖回收沒有問題發生,而在活動的實施中,回收會被搞砸嗎?

日誌表明,使用ListActivity時,一切都正確回收:

07-13 10:14:25.277: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 0 null type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:25.277: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 1 null type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:25.277: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 2 null type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:25.277: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 3 null type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:25.287: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 4 null type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:25.287: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 5 null type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:27.887: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 6 null type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:28.047: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 7 [email protected] type = 0 
    07-13 10:14:28.267: DEBUG/myCA(2336): getView 8 [email protected] type = 0 
... 
... 
... 

在我的執行活動,我看到以下內容:

07-13 10:11:47.517: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 0 null type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.517: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 1 [email protected] type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.517: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 2 [email protected] type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.517: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 3 and[email protected] type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.527: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 4 [email protected] type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.527: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 5 [email protected] type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.547: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 0 [email protected] type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.547: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 1 null type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.547: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 2 null type = 0 
07-13 10:11:47.557: DEBUG/myCA(2296): getView 3 null type = 0 
... 
... 
... 

那裏顯然是有問題的回收。

我是否遺漏了一些東西,當父活動只是一個簡單的活動而不是ListActivity時,會使listView行爲正常? 有沒有人遇到過類似的東西?

感謝您的時間。

+0

我不知道解決方案,但是您也可以將所有其他東西添加到ListActivity中,因爲ListActivity會擴展Activity。 – dbrettschneider

+0

據我所知,listview'回收'是重新使用已經在屏幕外移動的視圖。從那以後,我看不到第二個日誌顯示有問題。您將50個項目添加到列表中,所以最壞的情況是50個視圖。你有6,對應(我猜)關於屏幕的價值。要明確檢查,每次適配器創建一個新視圖時都可以嘗試保存一個引用 - 這樣您將獲得適配器創建的視圖總數。 – 2011-07-31 20:54:11

回答

1

ActivityListActivity都應該沒問題。我相信你通過參考mContext泄漏了整個活動。刪除它,看看會發生什麼!