我正在嘗試創建一個多線程程序,它將N個隨機數[-100,100]的數組與一個由程序員實現的自旋鎖(忙等待)序列化的K工作線程相加。在我嘗試使用隨機數之前,爲了測試目的,我用1代碼初始化了整個數組,就像我在代碼中看到的一樣。因爲我完全不知道自己在哪裏的問題,我會後的完整代碼:多線程執行時間與隨機數的總和
#include <iostream>
#include <string.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <time.h>
#include <atomic>
#include <chrono>
using namespace std;
using namespace chrono;
struct lock {
long double sum = 0;
atomic_flag m_flag = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT; // Inicializa com m_flag = 0
void acquire() {
while(m_flag.test_and_set());
}
void release() {
m_flag.clear();
}
};
struct t_data{
int t_id;
char* sumArray;
struct lock* spinlock;
};
void* sum(void* thread_data) {
struct t_data *my_data;
long double m_sum=0;
my_data = (struct t_data *) thread_data;
for (int i=0;i<strlen(my_data->sumArray);i++) {
m_sum += my_data->sumArray[i];
}
my_data->spinlock->acquire();
cout << "THREAD ID: " << my_data->t_id << endl;
cout << "Acquired lock." << endl;
my_data->spinlock->sum += m_sum;
cout << "Releasing lock..." << endl << endl;
my_data->spinlock->release();
}
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
// Inicializar cronômetro, arrays, spinlock,etc. , spinlock, etc.
system_clock::time_point starting_time = system_clock::now();
int K = atoi(argv[1]);
int N = atoi(argv[2]);
int temp;
double expected_sum = 0;
pthread_t threads[K];
struct t_data threads_data[K];
struct lock spinlock;
const long int numElements = (long int) N/K; //Divisão inteira de N/K para dividir array em parcelas
// Criar array[K] de arrays para delegar cada sub-lista a uma thread
char** numArrays = new char*[K];
for(int i=0;i<K;i++)
numArrays[i] = new char[numElements]; //Char utilizado para que seja alocado apenas 1 byte por número
// Inicializar seed aleatória para preenchimento de arrays
srand(time(NULL));
//Preencher arrays que serão passados às threads criadas
for (int i=0;i<K;i++) {
for(int j=0;j<numElements;j++) {
temp = 1;//rand() % 201 - 100; (CHANGING THIS GIVES UNEXPECTED RESULTS)
numArrays[i][j] = temp;
expected_sum+=temp;
}
//Criar threads e passando argumentos(id,spinlock,array)
threads_data[i].t_id = i;
threads_data[i].spinlock = &spinlock;
threads_data[i].sumArray = numArrays[i];
pthread_create(&threads[i],NULL,sum,(void*)&threads_data[i]);
}
// Parar o programa até que todas as threads terminem para imprimir soma correta
for (int i=0;i<K;i++){
if(pthread_join(threads[i],NULL)) cout << "Error waiting for threads." << endl;
}
// Somando últimos valores restantes no caso de N%K != 0 (esta parcela torna-se irrelevante à medida que N >> K)
for(int i=0;i<(int)N%K;i++) {
temp = 1;//rand() % 201 - 100; (CHANGING THIS GIVES UNEXPECTED RESULTS)
spinlock.sum+=temp;
expected_sum+=temp;
}
// Printar resultado esperado, o calculado e tempo de execução
cout << "EXPECTED SUM = " << expected_sum << endl;
cout << "CALCULATED SUM = " << spinlock.sum << endl;
// Liberar memória alocada
for(int i=0;i<K;i++)
delete[] numArrays[i];
delete[] numArrays;
auto start_ms = time_point_cast<milliseconds>(starting_time);
auto now = system_clock::now();
auto now_ms = time_point_cast<milliseconds>(now);
auto value = now_ms - start_ms;
long execution_time = value.count();
cout << "-----------------------" << endl;
cout << "Execution time: " << execution_time << "ms" << endl;
return 0;
}
這很好地工作在計算總和,但提出與執行時間的問題:它應該線性縮放(N/K),但在測試對於K = 10,N =10⁶:
EXPECTED SUM = 1e+06
CALCULATED SUM = 1e+06
-----------------------
Execution time: 1310ms
且k = 10,N = 2 *10⁶:
EXPECTED SUM = 2e+06
CALCULATED SUM = 2e+06
-----------------------
Execution time: 7144ms
我不知道爲什麼發生這種情況。它應該加倍。更改K正常工作。另外,如果我使用rand() % 201-100
而不是1件事情真的搞砸了。對於K = 10,N =10⁶:
EXPECTED SUM = -16307
CALCULATED SUM = 1695
-----------------------
Execution time: 95ms
和關於執行時間的變化中,N(線性尺度)固定的,而是ķ沒有差別了。這些對我來說都沒有意義。
在此先感謝!
當你用'char'表示'int'時,不知道'strlen'有這個問題。至於執行時間,你是對的。我開始只跟蹤並行執行,現在'K'和'N'都是線性的時間刻度。謝謝! –